Go beyond sample answers. Build situational judgment that scores.

Your personalized interview prep and upskilling coach for the age of AI

...or type any role or company

SJT Interview Coach

Skills-based. Curated. Adaptive.

Close your skill gaps

Track progress on your skill profile and achieve your career goals in the age of AI

Structured Problem Solving
Practitioner
Stakeholder Influence
Apprentice
AI Delegation
Apprentice

Click to expand

Deeply Researched

Every session is built around news, trends, earnings calls, and ideas shaping your profession today

You are a junior consultant on a Deloitte engagement. Your team lead asks you to...

Deloitte
AI FLUENCY

Deloitte

You are a newly qualified nurse on a hospital ward. A senior colleague asks you to...

NHS
AI FLUENCY

NHS

Click to expand

Interview Simulations

Mock interviews with sharp, realistic AI interviewer personas, interactives and exhibits

Framework
Main Branch
How serious is the data error?
Level 1
Would the error materially change the client's recommendation?
Level 2
Yes — the flawed revenue figure underpins the core recommendation
Level 2
Submitting now risks client trust and firm reputation
Level 1
Can you correct it yourself or is the other team needed?
Level 2
Correction requires source data only the other team holds
Level 2
Other team lead is available by Slack; could respond within the hour
Main Branch
What are the realistic response options?
Level 1
Submit as-is and flag in a footnote
Level 2
Risk: client acts on flawed data; footnote rarely read
Level 1
Contact other team now, interrupt manager briefly to align
Level 2
Best option: preserves quality, keeps manager informed, models good judgment
Level 1
Delay submission without telling manager
Level 2
Risk: manager blindsided, deadline missed with no warning — worst for trust

Click to expand

Sharpen Your Judgment

Get pressure-tested on which problems matter, which questions to ask, and how to prioritize

In the scenario where my manager is unavailable, I'd just wait until they're free rather than interrupt their meeting.

Thinking
AssessThe candidate is defaulting to passivity as a form of deference. In SJT contexts, inaction is never neutral — it's a choice with consequences. The candidate needs to see that waiting without communicating is itself a ranking-last option.
LocateThe decision calculus is: which costs more — a brief interruption that keeps the manager informed, or a surprise at 5pm when the report is either late or wrong? Most SJT rubrics penalise candidates who avoid escalation when the stakes are clear.
DecideReframe the choice as a trade-off between two costs, not between action and inaction. The candidate needs to see that all options have a cost — and the cost of waiting silently is typically highest.
Waiting is a decision too — it means accepting the risk of a late or incorrect submission. What's the cost of the error if the report goes out wrong versus the cost of a 60-second interruption to your manager?

Click to expand

Tailored Debriefs

Know exactly where you stand on every skill that matters — after every session

Situational Awareness
Strong
Stakeholder Management
Meeting Bar
Prioritisation
Developing
Judgment Under Pressure
Distinctive

Click to expand